A new peer‑reviewed study puts numbers to a familiar lived experience: ADHD boredom—feeling bored more often and more intensely than peers. In young adults with ADHD traits, researchers observed a dramatically higher boredom proneness and traced part of the effect to deficits in attention control and working memory. Converging evidence from child samples and sensory-processing research suggests this is not just a mood state but a measurable cognitive and perceptual issue with real clinical implications, from school performance to workplace engagement.

Key Takeaways

– shows young adults with ADHD traits report far more boredom than peers, with a very large difference (d=2.09) across 31 vs 57 participants. – reveals attention control and working memory partially mediate the ADHD–boredom link, explaining 5.8% and 6.4% of variance in boredom proneness. – demonstrates converging evidence in children: a 183-participant study (ADHD n=93; controls n=90) found elevated trait boredom, delay aversion, and inattention. – indicates April 2025 sensorimotor research: lower sensory information transmission predicts higher boredom; ADHD samples showed reduced decoding compared with non-ADHD peers. – suggests real-world relevance: a 12-week neurofeedback pilot (21 vs 15 controls) improved working memory; about half (~50%) reported symptom gains.

Why ADHD boredom intensifies with executive deficits

Boredom is not simply “nothing to do.” It often arises when we want to focus but cannot sustain attention on what matters, or when mental tasks exceed current cognitive resources. Two executive skills are central: attention control (the ability to shift and sustain focus) and working memory (holding and manipulating information). When these systems falter, tasks feel under‑stimulating or frustratingly hard, and engagement collapses. The new data show that both attention control and working memory weaknesses help explain why ADHD boredom is more frequent and more intense in individuals with ADHD traits.

Measuring ADHD boredom: effect size and mediation

The new PubMed‑indexed study quantified the gap. Published July 30, 2025 in the Journal of Attention Disorders, it compared young adults (mean age 19.1) with ADHD traits (n=31) against controls (n=57) and found a very large difference in boredom proneness (Cohen’s d=2.09), with attention control and working memory partially mediating the ADHD–boredom link and explaining 5.8% and 6.4% of variance, respectively [1].

Those percentages may sound small, but partial mediation suggests multiple overlapping routes to boredom: executive attention is one, reward sensitivity and delay aversion are others, and context (task novelty, stakes, and autonomy) still matters. Taken together, the findings argue for a layered model: core ADHD traits raise baseline boredom susceptibility, and executive deficits further magnify it when tasks are demanding, repetitive, or poorly matched to skill.

ADHD boredom across ages: evidence from children

ADHD boredom does not wait for adulthood. In a child cohort, researchers found that trait boredom is elevated alongside inattention, and that motivational timing factors (delay aversion—disliking waiting for rewards) help connect boredom to attention problems. On April 28, 2025, a Frontiers in Psychiatry study of 183 children (ADHD n=93; controls n=90) reported higher boredom proneness, delay aversion, and inattention, with delay aversion partially mediating the boredom–inattention link and parent/self ratings aligning [2].

This child evidence dovetails with the young‑adult data: across development, boredom looks less like a fleeting mood and more like a trait shaped by cognitive control, reward dynamics, and environmental fit. Practically, that means boredom can flag where supports are mismatched—work too easy or too hard, feedback too delayed, or autonomy too constrained.

The sensory dimension of ADHD boredom

Beyond cognition and motivation, perception matters. If the brain’s sensory channels transmit less information from the environment, tasks may feel flatter, less meaningful, and more boring—even when motivation is adequate. In April 2025, researchers reported that lower sensory information transmission predicts higher boredom; ADHD participants showed reduced perceptual decoding versus non‑ADHD groups, highlighting a potential sensory pathway into boredom and pointing to sensory‑targeted interventions as a complement to cognitive approaches [4].

This sensory insight helps reconcile why some people report boredom even during novel or externally stimulating tasks: if the nervous system is conveying a thinner signal, richer stimulation may still register as insufficient. It also suggests that environments with crisp signals—clear instructions, immediate feedback, well‑chunked information—could mitigate boredom risk.

ADHD boredom across settings: classrooms, campuses, and workplaces

The numbers translate directly to daily life. Large effect sizes like d=2.09 signal differences that are noticeable in classrooms and offices: rapid disengagement during repetitive tasks, a tendency to seek novelty, and frustration when goal‑relevant information outstrips working memory capacity. Students may drift during lengthy lectures without frequent retrieval practice or interaction. New hires may shine in high‑variety roles yet struggle in routine-heavy workflows without autonomy or timely feedback.

Design matters. Small, concrete shifts—shorter task blocks, visible progress markers, immediate reinforcement, and choice over task order—can reduce boredom by easing demands on attention control and working memory. Pairing complex tasks with scaffolds (checklists, chunking, external memory aids) keeps working memory load manageable, improving the odds of sustained engagement.

What the findings mean for treatment and daily life

The mediation data clarify not just why ADHD boredom is elevated but where to intervene: strengthen attention control and working memory, improve task‑environment fit, and increase agency. As clinician‑researchers summarized, boredom often signals a need for agency and better alignment between goals and available mental tools, a perspective echoed in coverage of the study’s 5.8%–6.4% mediation effects and clinical implications [3].

Early evidence also points to actionable skills training. In a Stanford‑reported neurofeedback pilot, 21 children who completed a 12‑week program were compared with 15 controls; most showed task‑based working memory gains and about half reported symptom improvement, suggesting that bolstering working memory capacity can reduce downstream attentional struggles that fuel boredom [5].

Interpreting the statistics: how big is d=2.09?

Cohen’s d measures standardized mean differences; values above 0.8 are typically considered large. At d=2.09, the boredom gap between the ADHD‑trait and control groups is not just detectable—it is enormous in practical terms. Such a magnitude implies substantial non‑overlap between group distributions. That scale helps explain clinical observations: when tasks lack novelty, feedback is delayed, or instructions are ambiguous, individuals with ADHD traits are disproportionately likely to disengage quickly.

By contrast, the mediation percentages (5.8% and 6.4%) are modest but meaningful. They indicate that attention control and working memory account for part—though not all—of why ADHD traits predict boredom. Other contributors likely include reward processing differences (e.g., delay aversion), sensory transmission, and environmental structure. Multifactor interventions that address several of these levers at once are therefore more likely to produce noticeable gains.

Practical strategies grounded in the data

– Reduce working memory load: externalize steps with checklists, visual cues, and progressive disclosure of information to prevent overload during complex tasks. – Strengthen attention control: brief, spaced focus intervals (e.g., 10–20 minutes) punctuated by micro‑breaks; interleave problem types to sustain engagement. – Increase immediacy and agency: shorten feedback loops, offer choice in task sequence, and define clear, near‑term milestones to counteract delay aversion. – Tune sensory input: ensure high signal‑to‑noise—concise instructions, highlighted keywords, and minimized irrelevant stimuli—so the environment is easier to decode. – Align tasks to optimal challenge: calibrate difficulty to maintain a “Goldilocks zone” where effort feels purposeful and progress is visible.

These adjustments do not “cure” boredom, but they directly target the mediators—attention control and working memory—while respecting motivational and sensory factors. Over time, even small percentage gains can stack into meaningful improvements in engagement and performance.

Sources:

[1] PubMed / Journal of Attention Disorders – Why Are Individuals With ADHD More Prone to Boredom? Examining Attention Control and Working Memory as Mediators of Boredom in Young Adults With ADHD Traits: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40730822/

[2] Frontiers in Psychiatry – Boredom proneness and inattention in children with and without ADHD: the mediating role of delay aversion: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12066767/ [3] ADDitude – ADHD Boredom Linked to Poor Working Memory, Attention Control: www.additudemag.com/chronic-boredom-working-memory-attention-control/” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.additudemag.com/chronic-boredom-working-memory-attention-control/

[4] MedicalXpress – Sensory perception linked to boredom in both ADHD and non-ADHD individuals: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-04-sensory-perception-linked-boredom-adhd.html [5] Stanford Report – Digital tool gives kids with ADHD real-time feedback on their brains: https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/03/digital-tool-adhd-feedback-brain-research

Image generated by DALL-E 3