For a growing slice of travelers, the Airbnb backlash is real—and measurable. From mass listing removals and city crackdowns to rising hotel prices and a costly service overhaul, the dynamics shaping where we sleep on the road are shifting fast. Spain is seeking the removal of nearly 66,000 suspected illegal listings, New York budget hotel nights hover around $300, and Airbnb is spending up to $250 million on “hotel‑like” services in 260 cities to restore trust. [3][4][5]

Key Takeaways

– Shows Spain seeking nearly 66,000 listing removals and a court ordering 4,984 pulled, signaling stricter enforcement reshaping short‑term rental supply. [3] – Reveals New York’s Local Law 18 cut under‑30‑day rentals, with legal listings plummeting and budget hotel nights clustering around $300 in 2024–2025. [4] – Demonstrates Airbnb’s $200–$250M bet on 260‑city ‘Airbnb Services’ to standardize amenities and counter softened demand and hotel competition. [5] – Indicates Airbnb already removed more than 200,000 low‑quality listings, acknowledging trust issues from hidden fees, stripped amenities, and inconsistent host standards. [2] – Suggests $400 cleaning fees and withheld basics erode goodwill, pushing value‑seeking guests back to hotels and alternative stays amid the Airbnb backlash. [2]

How the Airbnb backlash reached a tipping point

The honeymoon is over for many guests who once prized the flexibility and personality of home‑shares. By late summer 2024, industry experts were saying travelers had “fallen out of love” with the platform as fees rose and standards wobbled. Reports of $400 cleaning fees and hosts withholding basics fed a perception of nickel‑and‑diming that undermined value and trust. Airbnb’s response—removing more than 200,000 low‑quality listings—signaled the issues were not isolated edge cases. [2]

A June 19, 2025 Washington Post column captured the deterioration in service quality through vivid anecdotes: a guest charged extra for towels in France, a Lisbon flat shrouded in scaffolding, and listings whose glossy photos masked stripped amenities. The piece argued short‑term rentals have shifted from host‑led hospitality to a profit‑driven, commercialized model with absentee landlords and inconsistent standards—conditions that break the original social contract of the sharing economy. The upshot: when guests can’t reliably trust what they book, they change behavior. [1]

Facing that reality, Airbnb has pushed quality‑control efforts and emphasized crackdowns on problem listings. The company had already culled tens of thousands of low‑quality properties and, in May 2025, embarked on a redesign that folds in a new services business aimed at delivering hotel‑like consistency. The pivot is framed as a response to softened demand and intensifying hotel competition—two directional indicators of shifting traveler preferences when perceived value dips on home‑share platforms. [5]

Regulation accelerates the Airbnb backlash

The backlash isn’t only cultural; it’s regulatory—and it’s escalating. In May 2025, Spain’s government demanded the removal of nearly 66,000 Airbnb listings suspected of breaching tourist accommodation rules. Within that broader push, a court ordered the immediate withdrawal of 4,984 listings. The enforcement wave has been linked to renewed tourism protests and political pressure to protect housing, contain overtourism, and restore neighborhood livability. The practical effect for travelers: fewer legal options in popular cities and faster turnover of questionable listings. [3]

That enforcement makes the booking landscape more volatile. Travelers may see availability shrink ahead of peak summer weeks as municipalities verify permits and platforms preemptively prune risky listings. While proponents say this improves safety and fairness, it also constrains supply, especially at budget price points. For guests weighing options, sudden delistings translate into last‑minute scrambles or costlier substitutes—outcomes that magnify frustration and feed the narrative that short‑term rentals are now a riskier bet than they used to be. [3]

Price shock and shrinking supply push travelers back to hotels

New York City offers the most vivid U.S. example. Since Local Law 18 began enforcement in September 2023, short‑term rentals under 30 days are largely illegal unless the host is present. Legal listings plummeted, and by April 2024 reporting, travelers faced a sharply reduced inventory. The immediate market signal arrived in hotels: budget options clustered around $300 per night, nudging visitors toward chain properties, friends’ couches, New Jersey stays, or unregulated gray‑market alternatives. The convenience premium increasingly resides with hotels. [4]

When hotels sit near $300, the math for many value‑seekers flips. Once cleaning fees, service charges, and checkout chores are weighed against a mid‑tier hotel’s predictable service, daily housekeeping, and loyalty points, standardized properties can win. This shift is reinforced when guests hear stories of hidden fees or arrive to find a place mid‑renovation—scenarios that hotels, with stricter brand standards, tend to avoid. As supply tightens under enforcement, price dispersion grows, and hotels stand ready to capture displaced demand. [1][4]

Regulation and sentiment: the feedback loop powering the Airbnb backlash

Policy and consumer sentiment are now reinforcing each other. Residents lobbying city halls cite noise, party houses, and housing pressures; travelers share tales of missing amenities or extra fees; officials respond with enforcement; platforms purge risky inventory; and prices adjust in real time. Spain’s near‑66,000 removal demand and court‑ordered 4,984 withdrawals illustrate the scale of administrative levers available when political will aligns with resident complaints, emboldening other destinations to review their own enforcement playbooks. [3]

At the traveler level, the psychological cost of uncertainty can rival fees. If guests must message hosts to confirm basics like towels or Wi‑Fi, they may abandon the cart before the fees shock arrives. Firsthand reports of $400 cleaning charges and hosts withholding essentials exacerbate that “trust tax,” which can be more damaging than a published price increase because it makes comparisons harder and outcomes less predictable. Standardization, not just lower prices, has become a key decision criterion. [2]

Airbnb’s $200–$250M pivot: can services fix trust?

Airbnb’s May 13, 2025 redesign and the launch of “Airbnb Services” mark a bid to rebuild that trust. The company plans to roll out services in 260 cities, investing $200–$250 million to add hotel‑like amenities and narrow the gap that’s opened with traditional lodging. Executives framed the effort as a response to softened demand and rising hotel competition, while pairing it with tighter quality controls after culling tens of thousands of lower‑quality homes from the marketplace. [5]

The strategy acknowledges a core complaint: inconsistency. If a platform can guarantee linens, toiletries, and verified check‑in standards, it can neutralize the most volatile parts of the experience. That said, many pain points—from surprise fees to hosts’ responsiveness—live outside the app UI. Without transparent, all‑in pricing and enforceable house‑rules ceilings (e.g., realistic cleaning expectations), the perception of nickel‑and‑diming could persist, even as amenities improve. For guests, the real test will be whether fees and friction fall alongside new hotel‑style conveniences. [1][2][5]

The investment is large but targeted. By focusing on 260 cities first, Airbnb concentrates capital where demand is deepest and regulatory scrutiny sharpest. If Services can lift review scores, boost repeat bookings, and cut cancellations in these markets, the network effect could spread. However, regulation can outpace product fixes: Spain’s mass delistings or New York’s 30‑day rule won’t be softened by better linens. Compliance remains the gating factor where city rules are explicit and enforcement is active. [3][4][5]

What travelers should expect in 2025 peak season

Expect tighter compliance in tourist hotspots and more visible vetting on platforms. Spain’s campaign against nearly 66,000 listings and the court‑ordered removal of 4,984 properties indicate that permit status will matter as much as price or photos. Guests should anticipate more listings showing license IDs, clearer stay‑length minimums, and faster takedowns when rules are breached—changes that reduce surprise but also reduce last‑minute options at lower price points during high season. [3]

In New York, the under‑30‑day restriction remains the operating reality. Legal listings are fewer, and budget hotel nights around $300 have become a new floor for many stays. Travelers who need entire homes for short visits may increasingly favor adjacent markets—New Jersey, for instance—or shift stays to hotels that can guarantee availability and consistent standards without the messaging overhead home‑shares often require under tighter rules. That substitution effect is already visible in booking behavior and price signals. [4]

On platform experience, watch for “Airbnb Services” to advertise standardized amenities and clearer expectations in 260 cities. For guests burned by surprises—towels for an extra charge, construction noise, or cleaning chores—the promise of hotel‑like predictability could be persuasive. If the investment of $200–$250 million leads to fewer post‑stay disputes and a drop in cancellations, sentiment may thaw, at least in markets where compliance allows robust supply to remain on offer. The next six to twelve months will be telling. [1][5]

For now, the market is recalibrating. Enforcement waves and fee fatigue are pushing some travelers back to hotels, while platforms race to standardize quality. Airbnb has already removed over 200,000 low‑quality listings and is spending heavily to close the amenity gap, but regulation and consumer expectations have reset the baseline for trust. In an environment where a single $400 cleaning fee can sour a trip, transparency and consistency—not just design—will decide who wins the next booking. [2][5]

Sources: [1] The Washington Post – Airbnb and Vrbo are going downhill like a hippo on a water slide: www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/06/19/vacation-rentals-airbnb-vrbo/” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/06/19/vacation-rentals-airbnb-vrbo/ [2] Business Insider – Hosts Have Contributed to Airbnb’s Downfall, Experts Say: www.businessinsider.com/hosts-contributed-to-airbnb-downfall-experts-fees-high-costs-say-2024-8″ target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.businessinsider.com/hosts-contributed-to-airbnb-downfall-experts-fees-high-costs-say-2024-8 [3] BBC News – Spain clamps down on Airbnb as tourism backlash returns for summer: www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3wdd8lg581o” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3wdd8lg581o [4] The Guardian – ‘Must love dogs and rude roommates’: the scramble to get around New York’s Airbnb crackdown: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/25/new-york-airbnb-short-term-rentals-sublets [5] CNBC – Airbnb launches redesigned app, new services business: www.cnbc.com/2025/05/13/airbnb-app-redesign-services-business.html” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/13/airbnb-app-redesign-services-business.html

Image generated by DALL-E 3