An experimental pollen sunscreen developed by NTU Singapore has achieved SPF ≈30, blocking about 97% of UV radiation in animal-skin tests, while showing no detectable impact on corals even after 60 days of exposure in laboratory assays [1]. In contrast, corals exposed to commercial sunscreens bleached within two days and died by day six, underscoring pressing environmental concerns tied to conventional formulations and positioning a pollen-based approach as a potential reef-safe alternative [3]. The research was publicized on 4 September 2025, with the underlying paper published 14 August 2025 in Advanced Functional Materials [1][3].

Key Takeaways

– Shows NTU’s pollen sunscreen delivers SPF ≈30, blocking about 97% of UV on animal skin in controlled lab testing with academic collaborators [1]. – Reveals corals bleached by day 2 under commercial sunscreen and died by day 6, while pollen formulation showed zero harm through day 60 [3]. – Demonstrates skin-cooling of roughly 5°C that persisted for about 20 minutes, alongside UV performance comparable to commercial products [2]. – Indicates Camellia- and sunflower-derived pollen microgels can match UV protection while leveraging sporopollenin’s natural photoprotection [2]. – Suggests reef benefits matter as 6,000–14,000 tonnes of sunscreen wash into oceans annually, heightening demand for coral-safe options [4].

What the lab found: SPF 30, 97% UV block, and 5°C cooling

NTU researchers reported a pollen microgel derived initially from Camellia that achieved a sun protection factor near 30 in animal studies, corresponding to roughly 97% UV attenuation under standardized testing [1]. The lead team emphasized that the UV-blocking performance matched mainstream benchmarks for daily-wear sunscreens without evident trade-offs in laboratory settings, a notable milestone for a nontraditional filter system [1]. In practical terms, SPF 30 implies a significant reduction in UVB exposure, placing the pollen sunscreen firmly within a widely recommended protection range for routine use [1].

Beyond SPF, the formulation delivered a measurable thermal benefit. A separate coverage of the work noted the sunscreen cooled skin by approximately 5°C for 20 minutes, potentially improving comfort, especially in hot, sunny conditions when sunscreen use is most critical [2]. That cooling effect complements the microgel’s UV performance and could reduce perceived skin heat load after application, a rare additional function compared with conventional products [2]. The researchers also reported that the coating remains transparent at micron-thick layers, addressing a common consumer complaint about white cast from mineral-heavy sunscreens [3].

Pollen sunscreen vs. commercial formulas: performance on corals

In coral assays, a stark divergence emerged between the pollen sunscreen and conventional products. Corals exposed to commercial sunscreen showed bleaching by the second day and died by the sixth day, reinforcing concerns that some widely used filters and additives can harm sensitive marine species under test conditions [3]. By contrast, corals exposed to the pollen-based formulation remained healthy throughout a 60-day observation period, indicating the test material did not trigger bleaching or mortality under the same laboratory protocols [1].

While all lab models simplify complex real-world environments, a 60-day no-harm outcome contrasts strongly with a six-day mortality endpoint seen with commercial creams in the same setting, highlighting the ecological promise of a plant-derived approach [1]. For coastal economies dependent on reef health, reef-safe innovation is not just a marketing claim; it’s a quantifiable performance requirement that can be tested and compared over defined timelines [3]. These results will likely guide early regulatory and environmental reviews focusing on comparative toxicity and persistence profiles [3].

How pollen sunscreen works: sporopollenin microgels

The scientific backbone of the pollen sunscreen is sporopollenin, a robust biopolymer that forms the outer shells of pollen grains and is naturally resistant to UV, oxidation, and biodegradation [5]. Prior literature describes sporopollenin microcapsules as uniform, durable shells—around 25 micrometers for classic Lycopodium pollens—that can deliver photoprotective properties and even carry actives, indicating a versatile platform for sunscreen engineering [5]. NTU’s team leveraged this shell’s intrinsic UV resistance to construct microgels that create a protective, transparent layer on skin without relying on traditional mineral or organic UV filters as the main mechanism [1].

In their work, the researchers specifically processed Camellia pollen to produce a microgel network, with additional trials using sunflower pollen indicating the approach is not restricted to a single plant species [2]. The sporopollenin shell’s resilience under solar exposure and environmental stress suggests enhanced photostability, a key factor for maintaining consistent SPF during real-world use [5]. The transparent, micron-thick coating reported by the authors aligns with sporopollenin’s favorable optical characteristics, potentially minimizing scattering that typically causes whitening on skin [3].

Pollen sunscreen vs. commercial formulas: performance and comfort

Performance parity matters if alternatives are to gain market share quickly. In testing summarized by the research team, the pollen sunscreen delivered SPF ≈30 and blocked approximately 97% of UV, metrics that meet daily-use thresholds and are comparable to popular commercial options [1]. Consumer experience factors also count: the reported micron-thick transparency reduces white cast anxieties, while the roughly 5°C 20-minute cooling effect could offset thermal discomfort during application and early wear time [2][3]. Together, these traits address both efficacy and user acceptance—two hurdles that have limited adoption of “reef-safe” labels with inferior aesthetics [2].

The animal-skin tests were performed with collaborators at Seoul National University, ensuring cross-institutional rigor and adding credibility to the measured SPF values and film characteristics [3]. Importantly, the pollen-based film’s performance did not come at the expense of marine safety in lab assays, where 60 days of exposure produced no detectable coral harm—a stark contrast to the rapid bleaching and mortality triggered by commercial creams under the same conditions [1][3]. That dual outcome—valid UV protection plus coral compatibility—defines the core value proposition [1].

Environmental stakes: why a coral-safe approach matters

Marine researchers and policymakers have drawn attention to sunscreen runoff as a stressor on coral ecosystems, especially in tourism-heavy coastal zones [4]. Estimates suggest 6,000 to 14,000 tonnes of sunscreen enter the world’s oceans each year, a scale that magnifies even modest per-gram toxicity into ecosystem-level risk when combined with warming seas and pollution [4]. By delivering SPF ≈30 with no observed coral impact over 60 days, the pollen sunscreen addresses a quantifiable pathway of reef stress in a measurable time frame [1].

While field conditions vary—currents, dilution, UV intensity, and coral species—the lab’s binary outcome (no harm at 60 days for the pollen formulation versus death at six days for commercial sunscreens) provides a compelling comparative benchmark for environmental safety claims [3]. The potential to pair effective protection with reduced ecological footprint could resonate in regions contemplating stricter sunscreen regulations for reef zones and marine parks [4]. Scaling such solutions will hinge on reliable supply chains and consistent performance in diverse water chemistries [2][4].

Manufacturing, supply, and scalability considerations

Translating laboratory wins into commercial availability requires a secure, scalable pollen supply and standardized processing to form stable microgels batch after batch [2]. The NTU team highlighted the need for stability testing and scalable harvesting studies to validate quality, yield, and cost targets for real-world manufacturing [2]. Early demonstrations used Camellia pollen and also tested sunflower pollen, suggesting the platform may accommodate multiple feedstocks, potentially de-risking supply through diversification [2].

Processing must preserve sporopollenin’s integrity and the optical clarity that underpins the transparent micron-thick coating, while meeting cosmetic-grade purity standards [3]. Quality control metrics will likely include microgel size distribution, film uniformity, SPF retention after UV exposure, and shelf-life under heat and humidity stress [5]. If the manufacturing pathway can maintain performance at scale, the formulation’s eco-safety profile could justify premium positioning or regulatory endorsement for sensitive marine areas [2].

Safety, regulation, and the path to market

The pollen sunscreen has been tested on animal skin and in coral assays; human clinical evaluations will be essential to confirm SPF in vivo, UVA protection, photostability, sensitization, and photoallergy risk [3]. Regulators and certifiers will also examine batch consistency, potential impurities from plant sourcing, and any residual proteins that could induce allergy, even though sporopollenin itself is largely inert and robust [5]. The transparent, micron-thick film and the reported cooling effect will need to be validated in human panels using standardized protocols, including water-resistance tests and real-sun exposure trials [2][3].

From a labeling standpoint, claims around “reef-safe” increasingly require species-specific evidence and exposure-time thresholds; in this case, a 60-day no-harm result provides a concrete, testable claim for one set of lab conditions [1]. Additional studies across multiple coral species and water chemistries can expand the claim’s scope and support region-specific regulatory submissions, especially in jurisdictions with active sunscreen ingredient restrictions [3][4]. NTU’s publication in Advanced Functional Materials (DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202516936) sets a scientific foundation for that process [2][3].

What makes pollen sunscreen different: materials science under the hood

Traditional sunscreens rely on organic UV filters that absorb UV or inorganic minerals like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide that scatter and reflect it; the pollen approach centers on a biological shell with inherent photoprotection [5]. Sporopollenin’s crosslinked architecture confers UV resistance and chemical robustness, making it an attractive chassis for a protective film that doesn’t rely exclusively on synthetic filters to deliver SPF [5]. The review literature documents sporopollenin microcapsules’ durability, their relatively uniform size distributions, and their capacity to encapsulate active molecules for controlled release, expanding engineering options [5].

NTU’s microgel strategy effectively reconstitutes pollen shells into a coherent, transparent film, leveraging photostability while enhancing wearability through a cooling feature, which is rare in conventional sunscreens [1][2]. This material profile could also allow for multifunctional formulations, such as embedding antioxidants or hydration agents within the microgel network, though such additions would require separate safety and efficacy testing [5]. The platform’s modularity is promising for tailoring products to different climates and user needs [5].

What’s next: from promising lab data to beach-ready bottles

The study’s timeline matters for innovators and investors. NTU publicized the findings on 4 September 2025, with the peer-reviewed article appearing on 14 August 2025, positioning the technology at an early but visible stage for partnerships [1][3]. The immediate priorities include human SPF confirmation, UVA-PF characterization, water resistance, long-wear stability, and expanded ecotoxicology beyond corals, such as fish larvae and invertebrates relevant to coastal ecosystems [2][3].

From a go-to-market perspective, success will depend on proving that supply chains for Camellia or sunflower pollen can furnish cosmetic-grade material at scale and cost parity, while preserving the observed 60-day coral safety advantage [2]. Stakeholders will also look for robust head-to-head data against multiple commercial sunscreens across SPF tiers, as well as field studies in real ocean settings to bridge lab-to-life relevance [1][4]. If these milestones are met, a pollen sunscreen could redefine “reef-safe” from a label to a quantified performance standard [1].

Sources:

[1] Phys.org (NTU Singapore) – Cooling pollen sunscreen can block UV rays without harming corals: https://phys.org/news/2025-09-cooling-pollen-sunscreen-block-uv.html

[2] Technology Networks – A Coral-Safe, Skin-Cooling Sunscreen Made From Pollen: www.technologynetworks.com/applied-sciences/news/a-coral-safe-skin-cooling-sunscreen-made-from-pollen-404361″ target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.technologynetworks.com/applied-sciences/news/a-coral-safe-skin-cooling-sunscreen-made-from-pollen-404361 [3] EurekAlert! (NTU news release) – NTU Singapore scientists develop cooling sunscreen from pollen: www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1096862″ target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1096862

[4] Mirage News – Scientists Create Coral-Safe Sunscreen from Pollen: www.miragenews.com/scientists-create-coral-safe-sunscreen-from-1527304/” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.miragenews.com/scientists-create-coral-safe-sunscreen-from-1527304/ [5] Pharmaceutics (PMC, 2022) – Sporopollenin Microcapsule: Sunscreen Delivery System with Photoprotective Properties: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9609628/

Image generated by DALL-E 3