Age verification mandates rolling out in the UK are producing stark, quantifiable distortions in web traffic: compliant adult sites are hemorrhaging users while noncompliant rivals and VPN use surge, upending the policy’s intended outcomes and reshaping the online market almost overnight. After enforcement began July 25 under the Online Safety Act, Similarweb data show some of the UK’s largest adult platforms lost nearly half their visits within two weeks. [4][1]

Key Takeaways

– Shows Pornhub’s UK visits plunged 47% between July 24 and Aug 8, 2025 after age verification rolled out under the Online Safety Act. [1]
– Reveals Pornhub and XVideos each lost about 47% UK traffic, while xHamster dropped 39% as users pivoted to noncompliant alternatives and VPNs. [3]
– Demonstrates noncompliant sites saw traffic spikes as ID and selfie-based checks began July 25, potentially affecting Ofcom’s estimated 14 million UK adult viewers. [4]
– Indicates age checks now span over 20 U.S. states and countries including the UK, France, and Australia, triggering VPN downloads and market exits. [2]
– Suggests stricter ID and facial-scan mandates, highlighted Aug 29, 2025, risk depressing creator incomes and pushing audiences into riskier, unregulated platforms. [5]

Age verification reshapes UK web traffic

The UK’s enforcement deadline arrived July 25, when major adult sites agreed to implement “highly effective” age checks to comply with the Online Safety Act. Ofcom said measures could include credit-card checks, photo ID, or selfie-based age estimation, and warned that noncompliant services risk fines or blocking. [4]

Within days, traffic data captured a decisive swing. The Washington Post, citing Similarweb, reported Pornhub’s UK visits fell 47% from July 24 to Aug 8 as checks rolled out, highlighting the immediate friction created by face scans or ID uploads. [1] Additional Similarweb analytics reviewed by industry press show Pornhub and XVideos each lost roughly 47% of UK traffic, while xHamster fell 39% during the same enforcement window. [3]

Not all sites moved in lockstep. As the largest providers turned on verification gates, noncompliant destinations recorded traffic spikes, indicating users were actively substituting away from platforms that demanded credentials. [1] Industry observers also saw a “dramatic” rise in VPN downloads, a signal that some users sought to mask location or bypass checks rather than present identification. [3]

Experts caution that the new verification stack can misfire: algorithmic age estimation and document checks can produce unequal error rates, inadvertently blocking some adults while failing to catch others, and the data collection itself raises clear privacy risks for sensitive browsing. Those frictions—and concerns over where face scans and IDs are stored—help explain why measurable cohorts defected toward less regulated corners of the web. [1]

What age verification requires—and who it covers

Ofcom’s June 26 announcement set the compliance runway. It advised that major porn providers implement highly effective age checks by July 25, laying out acceptable approaches: credit-card verification, government-issued photo ID checks, or selfie-based age estimation. The regulator emphasized the aim of limiting access to an estimated 14 million UK adult viewers while protecting children, with powers to fine or block services that refuse to comply. [4]

The methods vary in friction. Credit-card checks and ID uploads require users to share high-trust credentials; selfie estimation asks them to scan their face for automated classification. Each method adds a time cost and a perceived privacy cost, especially when linked to adult content, which helps explain why traffic fell sharply on compliant platforms as soon as the gates went up. [4][1]

How age verification may incentivize evasion

The first-order economic signal is clear: verification reduces compliant platforms’ reach, while noncompliant sites—often offshore or less visible to UK enforcement—become substitutes, gaining audience share as users seek instant access without ID hurdles. Similarweb data show those substitution effects in the days immediately following enforcement. [1]

Industry experts warn that compliance is costly to build and maintain, and technical errors can lock out legitimate adults. Those burdens, paired with the risk of false positives, can nudge audiences toward unregulated venues or tools like VPNs, where oversight is weaker and safety standards are inconsistent. That pattern was visible in the UK, where reports describe a “dramatic” spike in VPN downloads alongside declines on verified platforms. [3]

The second-order effect is data flight. Rather than transacting with a vetted verifier, some users export their browsing to less accountable operators. That dynamic complicates the policy objective: child protection is harder to deliver if usage migrates to sites that ignore age rules altogether. [1][3]

The global march of age verification and free-speech concerns

The UK is not alone. AP News reports that age checks are proliferating across more than 20 U.S. states and in countries including the UK, France, and Australia, reflecting a broader political consensus to act—alongside rising alarm among civil libertarians. Critics worry about privacy, data retention, and chilled speech, while officials maintain that age checks are necessary to protect children. [2]

Those pressures have real market consequences. AP notes that some services have exited markets rather than navigate patchwork laws and compliance risk—an early example being Bluesky stepping back—while users in affected regions increasingly download VPNs to route around the rules. This creates jurisdictional arbitrage: platforms and audiences relocate digitally to avoid verification, undermining the reach of any single country’s statute. [2]

Economic fallout for platforms and creators under age verification

Beyond raw traffic, the new rules ripple through earnings. Wired documents how ID and facial-scan mandates are depressing independent creators’ incomes as audiences thin out on verified platforms and discoverability gets harder behind compliance gates. Some creators report losing paying subscribers, while others worry that verification centralizes power with the biggest platforms that can afford compliance at scale. [5]

Experts interviewed by Wired warn that consolidation and stricter onboarding can push both users and creators into riskier, unregulated spaces—where payment processing is murkier and safety policies are weaker—amplifying the very harms policymakers seek to mitigate. The upshot: age verification can reorder market structure, concentrating traffic and revenue while draining smaller operators. [5]

What the numbers imply for UK enforcement strategy

The headline data points—47% traffic drops for top sites and a 39% decline for a major rival—capture a policy paradox: compliance reduces exposure where it is implemented, but the aggregate risk may simply be redistributed as users pivot to noncompliant sites and VPNs. Measured solely by visits to regulated platforms, the policy looks effective; measured by total access across the web, the picture is more ambiguous. [1][3]

Ofcom’s enforcement toolkit includes fines and blocking, which could shrink the pool of noncompliant destinations reachable from the UK and reduce the substitution effect. Yet the practical challenges of dynamic blocking, mirror sites, and encrypted traffic—combined with easy VPN access—mean that deterrence may need to pair with privacy-preserving verification methods that minimize friction and data collection. [4][3]

Metrics to watch as age verification expands

As more jurisdictions adopt age checks, trend lines worth monitoring include net reach across all adult sites (not just compliant ones), VPN download volumes, abandonment rates at the verification step, and the share of traffic consolidating on a few large platforms that can absorb compliance costs. These indicators will show whether child-protection goals are being met—or merely displacing activity out of view. [2][3]

Another crucial metric is error disparity in automated age estimation and document matching. If false rejections disproportionately affect certain demographics, the policy carries equity risks alongside privacy risks—one reason experts warn about “unequal algorithmic errors” in real-world deployments. Designing verifiers that reduce bias, minimize data retention, and offer independent audits could improve both adoption and outcomes. [1]

Bottom line

In the UK’s early results, age verification is doing exactly what friction tends to do on the internet: it punishes compliant services in the short term and rewards those that forgo the rules. Traffic losses of 47% at major sites, a 39% drop at another, and visible spikes for noncompliant competitors suggest that enforcement, as currently structured, is shifting demand rather than eliminating it—at least until blocking or broader international coordination brings the entire market under the same discipline. [1][3][4]

Sources:
[1] The Washington Post – ‘Scan your face’ laws for the web are having unexpected consequences: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/31/age-verification-uk-porn-sites/
[2] AP News – Online age checks are proliferating, but so are concerns they curtail internet freedom: https://apnews.com/article/1cf99c96ab6b461cf7612d312e111e79
[3] Biometric Update – Online Safety Act irks UK porn users, US State Department: https://www.biometricupdate.com/202508/online-safety-act-irks-uk-porn-users-us-state-department/
[4] Ofcom – UK’s major porn providers agree to age checks from next month: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/uks-major-porn-providers-agree-to-age-checks-from-next-month
[5] Wired – The Internet Revolutionized Porn. Age Verification Could Upend Everything: https://www.wired.com/story/the-internet-revolutionized-porn-age-verification-could-upend-everything

Image generated by DALL-E 3