The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission accelerated the path for crypto ETFs on September 18, cutting the maximum approval window for spot listings to 75 days from roughly 240 and enabling exchanges to list products beyond bitcoin and ether under generic standards [1]. NYSE, Nasdaq and Cboe can now use those standards, compressing review timelines to as little as 75 days, a shift some issuers called a watershed moment for mainstream access to digital assets [3]. In parallel, the Rex‑Osprey Dogecoin ETF is set to begin trading on Cboe with a 1.5% fee amid a market where bitcoin and ether ETFs hold over $175 billion combined [2].

The moves could spark an October launch window for the first wave of non‑BTC/ETH spot funds, with industry expectations coalescing around Solana and XRP as early candidates under the new rule set [3]. The SEC also signed off on Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund that tracks the CoinDesk 5 index including BTC and ETH, signaling a broader willingness to approve diversified structures alongside single‑asset spot funds [4]. Abroad, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority proposed exemptions from certain conduct rules for crypto firms while tightening resilience obligations after a reported $1.5 billion Bybit hack, with consultation running through November 12, 2025 [5].

Key Takeaways

– Shows the SEC slashed maximum spot crypto ETF approvals about 69%, compressing timelines from roughly 240 days to 75 under generic listing standards [1]. – Reveals NYSE, Nasdaq and Cboe can now list spot crypto ETFs via streamlined rules, enabling first launches as early as October 2025 [3]. – Demonstrates market maturity as bitcoin and ether ETFs surpass $175 billion AUM while a Dogecoin ETF lists at a 1.5% fee on Cboe [2]. – Indicates regulators approved a large‑cap fund tracking the CoinDesk 5 index, expanding beyond single‑asset formats to diversified crypto exposures [4]. – Suggests UK policymakers will exempt some conduct rules yet mandate tougher resilience after a $1.5 billion hack, with feedback due November 12 [5].

What the SEC’s new rules mean for crypto ETFs

By approving generic listing standards for spot crypto ETFs, the SEC reduced the procedural grind from roughly 240 days to 75 days, a cut of about 68.8% that materially de‑risks timing for issuers and exchanges [1]. The changes apply across major U.S. venues, with NYSE, Nasdaq and Cboe now authorized to adopt the standards that streamline review and move many applications onto a fast track [3]. Industry participants framed the pivot as “opening the floodgates,” a sign the U.S. is transitioning from bespoke crypto approvals to a rules‑based regime that treats digital assets more like equities or commodities ETPs [1].

Shorter, standardized timelines translate into clearer product roadmaps and lower cost of capital for issuers that previously had to budget for up to eight months of uncertainty [1]. The decision also broadens the scope beyond bitcoin and ether, allowing exchanges to list spot crypto ETFs tracking other tokens that meet the criteria under the generic standards [1]. That expansion is crucial for market depth: it encourages competition on fees, liquidity provision, and index methodology, while giving investors more precise options for exposure compared with holding coins directly [3].

Market impact: flows, fees and memecoin crypto ETFs

The immediate AUM context is significant: U.S. bitcoin and ether ETFs now hold more than $175 billion combined, providing a deep pool of secondary‑market liquidity into which new funds may tap for hedging and pairs trading [2]. Cost will be a differentiator, and the first memecoin entry underscores that spread: the Rex‑Osprey Dogecoin ETF carries a 1.5% fee and will list on Cboe, a premium that explicitly prices perceived volatility and operational frictions in a non‑blue‑chip token [2]. Supporters see a watershed moment for consumer choice; critics warn memecoin ETFs risk legitimizing assets with scant intrinsic value [2].

Price discovery dynamics could evolve as market makers calibrate spreads and inventory risk for newly listed products that do not have the same depth as BTC/ETH [2]. If altcoin crypto ETFs attract sustained inflows, correlations across digital assets could change, with potential rotation from direct coin holdings into regulated wrappers that fit brokerage and retirement accounts [2]. At the same time, higher expense ratios can erode returns over time, pushing sophisticated investors toward lower‑cost vehicles or diversified indices, depending on tracking quality and liquidity in the underlying markets [2].

The product pipeline: Solana, XRP and large‑cap crypto ETFs

Issuers and exchanges are signaling Solana and XRP as likely first movers for spot crypto ETFs under the generic standards, with launch windows in October 2025 if filings meet the streamlined criteria [3]. A faster path specifically benefits tokens with established market infrastructure—reliable price feeds, robust custody, and deep spot trading—that underpin the surveillance and pricing frameworks exchanges must demonstrate [3]. By concentrating on these prerequisites, the SEC’s approach may channel early approvals toward higher‑volume networks before expanding to smaller cap assets over time [1].

Diversification options are also expanding alongside single‑asset funds. The SEC’s approval of Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund, which tracks the CoinDesk 5 index including BTC and ETH, signals regulatory comfort with index‑based exposure that can reduce idiosyncratic token risk in one ticker [4]. For multi‑asset vehicles, methodology transparency—weights, rebalancing cadence, and inclusion rules—will be central to investor trust, especially if new tokens enter the eligibility set under the generic standards in subsequent quarters [4]. Together, single‑asset and index options should broaden the toolkit for portfolio construction in regulated wrappers [4].

U.S. acceleration vs. UK recalibration

While the U.S. accelerates approvals, the UK is proposing a different balance: exempting crypto firms from certain conduct rules to spur competitiveness, while imposing tougher operational resilience after a reported $1.5 billion Bybit hack [5]. The Financial Conduct Authority’s consultation runs until November 12, 2025, creating a near‑term policy fork where the U.S. focuses on exchange‑traded access and the UK emphasizes firm‑level controls and market infrastructure hardening [5]. For global issuers, that divergence means tailoring products and risk frameworks to distinct rulebooks, even as investors increasingly demand cross‑border consistency [5].

The UK debate also interacts with ETF prospects indirectly: stronger resilience obligations could improve the reliability of custodians, venues, and data providers that ETF issuers depend on, potentially lowering the perceived operational risk discount in European markets over time [5]. Conversely, exemptions from integrity‑style rules may raise consumer‑protection concerns, prompting more prescriptive disclosures if crypto products list on UK venues in the future [5]. In the near term, however, the U.S. remains the epicenter for spot ETF innovation and scale given its compressed approval windows and outsized AUM base in BTC/ETH funds [1].

How quickly the new crypto ETFs could arrive

Timelines matter for both market structure and investor behavior. Under the SEC’s change, a filing that previously stretched roughly 240 days could now complete in as few as 75 days if it meets generic standards, clearing the way for October debuts in some cases [3]. Exchanges have already telegraphed that they expect to list new spot crypto ETFs beyond BTC/ETH by October 2025, a cadence that lines up with the compressed review cycle and existing operational readiness in market‑leading tokens [1]. For traders, that means liquidity planning can shift from “if” to “when” within a single quarter [1].

Launch day mechanics will hinge on authorized participant readiness, seed capital size, and underlying market depth—factors that directly influence the opening‑day spread and tracking quality [3]. Given the 1.5% fee set for Dogecoin and the substantial AUM embedded in BTC/ETH ETFs, investors will likely weigh cost versus novelty, with some opting for diversified index exposure to balance risk and fees [2]. Issuers, meanwhile, may emphasize education around creation/redemption and fair value to mitigate mispricing risks during volatile sessions, especially for tokens with thinner order books relative to bitcoin and ether [3].

Investor checklist: what to watch in the first quarter

– Fee versus liquidity: Higher expense ratios can be offset by tight spreads in large funds; for niche tokens, both cost and spreads may be elevated on launch [2]. – Tracking and slippage: Compare net asset value deviations during volatile hours to assess market maker performance and index calculation reliability in less liquid tokens [3]. – Index transparency: For multi‑asset products, examine constituent weights, rebalancing dates, and inclusion criteria to understand risk concentration and potential turnover [4]. – Regulatory cadence: Watch how many filings convert within 75 days and whether early approvals cluster around a few tokens with robust surveillance sharing [1]. – Cross‑border policy: UK consultation outcomes on resilience could influence custody standards and service‑provider risk for issuers operating in both markets [5].

Bottom line on the next phase for crypto ETFs

The SEC’s rule change replaces ad hoc momentum with a timeline investors can model: a roughly 69% faster path from application to market for spot crypto ETFs [1]. Combined with a $175+ billion BTC/ETH ETF base and the debut of a 1.5%‑fee Dogecoin fund, the market now has both scale and range—albeit with divergent cost and risk profiles across assets [2]. Expect first‑wave approvals to cluster around Solana, XRP, and diversified indices, with October a realistic launch window if filings are in good order and exchanges press ahead under the new standards [3].

Yet speed amplifies responsibility. Issuers must align custody, market making, and disclosure to minimize tracking error, while exchanges calibrate surveillance for assets with different liquidity and on‑chain dynamics [3]. Policymakers abroad, notably the UK, are signaling they will tighten resilience even as they loosen certain conduct rules, a reminder that crypto market access and market safety are advancing in parallel—and sometimes in tension—across jurisdictions [5]. For investors, the next quarter offers an unusually clear catalyst map: lower approval friction, new tickers, and a test of how far mainstream demand extends beyond BTC and ETH [1].

Sources:

[1] Reuters – SEC paves way for crypto spot ETFs with new listing rules: www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/sec-paves-way-crypto-spot-etfs-with-new-listing-rules-2025-09-18/” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/sec-paves-way-crypto-spot-etfs-with-new-listing-rules-2025-09-18/

[2] Financial Times – Dogecoin ETF to begin trading in ‘watershed moment’ for pro-crypto SEC: www.ft.com/content/9ce02f45-1060-46a1-b37f-218d0037e621″ target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.ft.com/content/9ce02f45-1060-46a1-b37f-218d0037e621 [3] CNBC – SEC paves way for crypto spot ETFs with new listing rules: www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/sec-paves-way-for-crypto-spot-etfs-with-new-listing-rules.html” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/18/sec-paves-way-for-crypto-spot-etfs-with-new-listing-rules.html

[4] CoinDesk – SEC Makes Spot Crypto ETF Listing Process Easier, Approves Grayscale’s Large-Cap Crypto Fund: www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/09/17/sec-makes-spot-crypto-etf-listing-process-easier-approves-grayscale-s-large-cap-crypto-fund/” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/09/17/sec-makes-spot-crypto-etf-listing-process-easier-approves-grayscale-s-large-cap-crypto-fund/ [5] Reuters – UK regulator proposes exempting crypto firms from ‘integrity’ and other rules: www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/uk-regulator-proposes-exempting-crypto-firms-integrity-other-rules-2025-09-17/” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/uk-regulator-proposes-exempting-crypto-firms-integrity-other-rules-2025-09-17/

Image generated by DALL-E 3